On 2008-12-18 16:20, Toli wrote:
My experience with DSLRs is limited to this point, so I would say this camera is out of my league at this time.
Toli
Toli- The Alpha 900 is out of my league also as the largest printer I have access to is my Dad's Epson Pro 4000 which prints a maximum of 17" which is less than 1/4 the size that the Alpha 900 shoots and to resize a 24.6 MP photo down to <0.6 MP to post here at Agoraquest would just be an insult to a fine camera like the Alpha 900 which Sony made for much, much bigger venues.
I've used a lot of cameras over the years including the renown German Leica and a camera like a Musical instrument functions no better than the person using it. Your A-100 at 10 MP is certainly all the camera that you or anyone but a Pro photographer would need to take excellent pictures that can be printed or Posted on line. The Alpha 900 does have some additional functions and features, but like I said unless someone has a Professional Print Shop they will never be able to be fullly used and that is why we will most likely never see anyone around here spend $3,000 on one of these Pro cameras and to us photographers without professional facilities it will just remain a very expensive statement piece just like Sony Reference Audio gear or the Qualia line of Sony Video gear which would be great to own, but we seem to do very fine without.
From the Digital Trends Review...
Conclusion The Sony alpha DLSR-A900 is a terrific camera. It’s clearly for serious photographers who want excellent quality and are interested in making large prints. It’s easy to recommend, but alas, not so easy to pay for, since you’ll want a super-quality lens—and don’t forget the flash.
Pros: • Beautiful 24.6MP stills
• Outstanding viewfinder
• Built-in image stabilization
• Intelligent Preview very helpful
• Easy to operate
Cons: • It’s still 3 grand; for serious photographers only
• Limited “cheat” modes
• Not weatherized like other
uber D-SLRs
• Heavy and bulky
What a great summary of the Alpha 900. After adding a "super-quality lens" and a flash for its hot shoe a serious photographer would be out far in excess of $5,000 for a camera that in all practicality can not render a more useful image than your A-100 is capable of unless of course you have a $15,000 60" printer in storage that you want to start making use of.
My Dad once told me that on many occasions he was able to take better pictures with his $15 Argus camera than he did with the much more expensive Leica camera that he bought years later (for reference the 1997 Leica reissue sold for $5,500) and he attributed this to the fact that he was forced to put more effort into getting high quality pictures from the ultra basic feature challenged Argus and it showed up in the prints. Learning the Art of Photography will improve the quality of the pictures you take far and away more than owning a more expensive camera ever will.
~Maxx~
-----------------
A Satisfied Sony Fan Since 1974!
Quick Link to MaxxPix